Helping directors online for over 23 years.

Talk to us today in confidence:

What next for pre packs

7th April, 2011

Written ByEric Walls MIPA FABRP

Director of Insolvency and Turnaround

Eric is a licensed insolvency practitioner regulated and licensed by the Insolvency Practitioners Association. His ethos is always "give the right advice, choose the right options, rescue first if possible." He has many years’ experience in accounting and insolvency having worked at Touche Ross (Deloitte) and has been involved in turnaround and insolvency since the late 80's.
Keith and Eric first met in a pub in Darlington in 2000(!) and have worked closely ever since, with Eric as a partner in Marlor Walls and now a director of KSA Group.
Eric has acted as nominee and supervisor of over 350 CVAs in that time and knows the pressures and difficulties of that approach on all parties involved in making the effort for a successful rescue of the business.
From smaller “family owned” companies, to businesses with a turnover exceeding £20 million, a CVA can prove an invaluable rescue package, securing not only a better return for creditors than might otherwise be generated, but also allowing the business to survive and to continue to work with its trusted suppliers.


Following the consultation on from Ed Davey MP’s announcement that he is looking into ways of improving the pre pack administration process there has been much comment. The principal complaint, as most people know, is that the process is seen as opaque and unsecured creditors get no chance to scrutinize the deal to sell the business. This is particularly an issue where the company is sold to the previous management very quickly.

On the one hand, the prepack is seen by turnaround practitioners as a useful tool to save a business. The principle purpose of administration is after all rescue first, then the best return achievable for creditors. Of course one tends to go with the other. If a business is in dire financial trouble but there is a possibility that the business could be sold, jobs saved and a new management team in place, even with some previous directors on board, is this not a good thing?

On the other hand, the problem is that there is often not a chance for a competitive bidding situation to emerge as time is critical to stop immediate creditor legal actions such as a winding up petition. The government is proposing a time period of three days in which creditors can challenge the deal. SIP 16 is in our view a sensible check and balance that ensures that other options have been evaluated. In the absence of buyers, and tight finance, there are unlikely to be many buyers in the market so as long as the management can buy the business and assets at a fair price then it is often the only option. It should be remembered that if a business is put into administration for a period then the return to creditors is likely to be poor especially if employees walk and much of the goodwill of the business is lost.

Related Guides

Related News

We can help you get out of the mess!

Call now for free and confidential advice